Message board

The current landscape

Chinese made lenses are having a moment. Brands like Viltrox, 7Artisans, and Laowa had exploded onto the market, shattering the long held belief that "cheap" meant "bad." They were producing optics that, just a few years ago,
would have been unimaginable at their price points, even introducing high quality autofocus options. For photographers on a budget, for students, for hobbyists wanting to dip a toe into the luxury of a fast prime lens, it was
a golden age.

Disclaimer

The fictional story featuring 'Ethan' reflects widely reported, brand agnostic risks common to the newer third party lens market, which can be easily validated by current online reviews and owner feedback. While these brands d
eliver exceptional optical value, buyers should be aware of a critical trade off. These generalized risks include: higher sample to sample variation (inconsistent quality control), a limited long term track record for new AF m
echanisms, and minimal to non existent direct manufacturer support (firmware/repair). Crucially, the low initial cost comes at the expense of retained value, as these lenses suffer immediate and steep depreciation due to rapid
model releases and market competition. Buyers should research retailer return policies carefully and factor in the lack of established, long term service infrastructure, especially if the lens is intended for professional or frequent swap use.

The controversial part

"Ethan's dilemma" underscores a controversial, yet increasingly acknowledged, reality in the modern camera market: while Chinese third party manufacturers are democratizing high quality optics with incredibly low prices, this front end savings is often offset by significant financial and practical drawbacks. The trade off is clear, photographers gain access to "90% of the image quality for 30% of the price," but must accept the consequences of a less mature ecosystem, which includes inconsistent quality control, inadequate customer support infrastructure and most brutally for the flipper photographer, near immediate catastrophic depreciation and low resale value.

The story

Lets bring our imaginary photographer Ethan and his new Chinese made lens into our anlysis.  

After reviewing a close up of a flower. Ethan had the following thoughts, "90% of the image quality for 30% percent of the price. That Canon L series can keep its red ring." 

Ethan loved the lens. He really did. But, something kept nagging him. Ethan was a flipper, a photographer who was regularly upgrading looking for the next shinny object. He liked to experiment with different lenses, constantly chasing that perfect lens.

For years, he had operated with a simple financial model,  buy a new Canon or Nikon lens, use it for a year or less, and then sell it used for 70-80% of what he paid for it. The cost of renting a high end lens for a year was relatively small. (I have done this myself and am actually selling my Zeiss 50mm Otus ML in Z mount.)


The first sign of trouble 

The first sign of trouble wasn't in the optics, but in the electronics. A few months in, the lens started occasionally hunting for focus, even in good light. Ethan went to the manufacturer's website for a firmware update. What he found was a confusing page with a barely translated manual and a file that simply read "AF FIX.EXE." 

It was a stark reminder that these lenses, for all their optical prowess, were not in the same league as the higher end premium models. That stigmatism associated with Chinese manufactured products, the assumptions of poor support and corner cutting was a reality in the optics world.

The problem wasn't just if the lens was good, it was about the bogus firmware and the poor interpretation of documentation that made troubleshooting a nightmare. The engineering prowess that ground the beautiful glass did not extend to the software, the customer service, or the quality control. Online forums were rife with stories of sample variation, one photographer’s copy was flawless, while the next received a lens with a slightly de centered element, a clear consequence of less rigorous quality checks to keep costs down.

Ethan eventually fixed the focusing issue through a convoluted process described in a broken English forum post, but the experience soured him. Rememebr, Ethan was a flipper, and he knew he had to get out now before a bigger issue arose which brings us to the 2nd part of the story. 


The Drop in Value

This new, impressive Chinese lens even with it's flaws was a different calculus. 

The first hint of trouble came when Ethan was looking to dump the lens or simply go for something new. In this case, with his AF issue fixed, Ethan had an itch for a wider prime and decided to sell his 85mm. He listed it on the popular gear forums for a modest $50 drop from his purchase price, figuring the excellent reviews and nearly new condition would ensure a quick sale. However,  Silence. He lowered the price. More silence. He dropped it again, this time significantly. He was now selling it for nearly half what he paid, and only then did the inquiries trickle in. The final sale price felt like a punch in the gut.

Just go to keh.com and request a quote on a trade in for one of these lenses. You will be shocked! 

It was the photographic equivalent of buying a new car. The instant you drive a new car off the lot, it suffers the steepest depreciation hit. It doesn't matter how well you take care of it, the moment it’s used, the resale market, saturated with new models and competing with other low cost options, simply doesn't value it.


A reality check 

A Canon, Nikon, Zeiss, Leica or Sony lens is like a high end Swiss watch. It holds its value because of the brand and the decades of trust. A new Chinese lens is like a fast fashion garment. Everyone knows a new, even cheaper and slightly better model is coming out next month.

For Ethan, in today's fast paced world of mirrorless technology, where new gear is announced seemingly every week, that drop in value was immediate and brutal. The very thing that made the lens attractive, its low new price, worked against it in the resale market. Why pay Ethan $250 for a used copy of his Brand X lens, when a brand new, slightly upgraded model is available from the factory for $300, complete with a fresh warranty? 

Ethan stared at the receipt in his hand, a stark reminder of the financial difference between a low purchase price and a high retained value. He had saved money on the front end, only to lose far more on the back end. The lesson was clear. If you plan to frequently swap out your lenses, stick to the premium brands.