
There is a common trap we fall into as photographers where we start viewing lenses as sets of data points and price to performance ratios. I have been guilty of it myself. In recent months, I found myself looking at the incredible offerings from Voigtlander, specifically the 50mm f/1.2 and f/1.0 Noktons, and questioning the Leica tax. On paper, those lenses are more than just viable alternatives, they are giant killers that give the Summilux a serious run for its money at a fraction of the investment. But paper specs and real world are two very different things.
I took the 50mm Lux ( 11729 ) out to downtown Portland today paired with my M11, and the experience was a blunt reminder of why this lens sits at the top of the food chain. Shooting street portraits between f/1.4 and f/2.8, I stopped looking at the corners and started looking at the stories. There is a specific way this glass draws a scene that remains unmatched. It isn't just about the resolution, which is admittedly spectacular on the M11, but the way it transitions from the subject to the background. Even when stopping down.
The color rendering has a depth and a wet to it look, a rich, deep saturation that feels alive and organic. It’s a far cry from the sterile, clinical output you get from so many modern high performance lenses. While other lenses might be just as sharp, they often lack that elusive, magical character that makes a portrait feel like a three dimensional rather than a flat file. The new close focus capability only adds to this versatility, allowing for an intimacy in street work.
Owning a Summilux isn't about making the most logical financial decision, it is about owning a lens that still defines the gold standard. After today, it's clear that while the price is steep, you really do get what you pay for.
For me, today was a reminder that while the price is high, the payoff is real. It was never a matter of doubting the lens’s performance, but rather questioning if that extra investment truly shows up in your images. After seeing these M11 files, it’s clear that it does. On a side note, I no longer have my Zeiss 50mm Otus ML, which is likely the only glass capable of truly dethroning the Summilux. I’ll eventually have to dig through my files and compare today's shots against some of the older work I did with the Otus on my Zf just to be sure, but for now, the Lux feels untouchable. If you already own this lens, you can feel confident that while other brands are closing the gap, the Summilux still sits on a throne that nobody else has quite managed to take.
Moving on with some sample, I am including several of the shots in both color and black and white. I wanted to show exactly how this lens behaves across both mediums, because the way it handles tonal transitions in monochrome is just as impressive as that deep, rich color palette. It’s a good way to see how the rendering holds up when you strip the color away and just look at the light and the draw.
I can't believe you sold yours and got the classic line non asph. This newer one blows that away.
Hold your horses there buddy. I felt the same way originally but had a complete change of heart. The new classic re-issues are amazing! Read this Review
I can't believe you sold yours and got the classic line non asph. This newer one blows that away.